A Landmark Development in the Ongoing Romanian Case
In a pivotal ruling that once again vindicates Andrew Tate's public statements, Rejust.ro — the official Romanian judicial portal — has confirmed that the Bucharest court has returned the case to prosecutors after finding the indictment legally invalid. Despite attempts by the mainstream media to spin the story, the court's own record clearly supports what Tate himself has said all along: the case was dismissed at the procedural level.
The Facts They Don't Want You to Know
According to the official court entry:
"Solution in brief: Sending the case to the prosecutor in accordance with the provisions of art. 255 para. 1 of the Criminal Procedure Code, since the preliminary chamber judge has exhausted his functional competence with the return of the case to the prosecutor's office."
In simple terms, this means the judge rejected the indictment and sent it back to DIICOT, Romania's anti-organized crime prosecution unit. The file cannot proceed to trial — the indictment is not valid.
The decision, which was postponed until January 23, 2025, but ultimately approved, officially halts the case in its current form.
Andrew Tate Was Right — Again
For months, Tate maintained that his case in Romania had been "dismissed." Critics called it misleading, yet the legal reality now confirms that the indictment itself was indeed thrown out.
The court's ruling means Tate and his brother remain charged but not indicted, and there is no active trial. Prosecutors will have to restart the process if they want to pursue it further — a major setback to the narrative that this was a solid case.
"The truth always wins. It may take time, but justice cannot be denied forever." – Andrew Tate
What This Means
This development is more than just a technical correction — it's a procedural victory that underscores the weakness of the prosecution's case. It proves:
- The indictment could not survive judicial scrutiny.
- The court recognized fundamental flaws in the prosecution's submission.
- The media's portrayal of an "ongoing trial" was false.
- Andrew Tate's claims of a dismissal were factually grounded in Romanian law.
The Pattern Continues
Just like the recent CPS decision in the United Kingdom, where prosecutors declined to press charges, this Romanian ruling fits a clear pattern: grand accusations, global headlines, zero convictions.
Every serious legal body that has reviewed the allegations has reached the same conclusion — the evidence is not credible, and the prosecutions cannot proceed.
The so-called "matrix" has relied on noise, not facts. But when exposed to genuine judicial oversight, their narrative collapses every time.
Media Silence
The same media outlets that flooded headlines with sensational accusations have remained completely silent on this major development. No corrections. No updates. No transparency.
Their refusal to report the truth only reinforces what millions have already realized — this was never about justice. It was about control, reputation destruction, and silencing a man who refuses to conform.
A Victory for Truth and Accountability
This decision marks another milestone in the ongoing unraveling of the false narratives built around Andrew Tate. It's not just a victory for him — it's a victory for everyone who values truth, due process, and the presumption of innocence.
The Romanian court has spoken. The indictment was not valid.
The case has been sent back.
The matrix narrative has crumbled once again.
Stay Informed
The mainstream media won't cover these victories — but we will.
Follow us for every legal update, every document, every truth they refuse to publish. The fight for transparency and justice isn't over — it's just beginning.
Truth cannot be buried forever.
